The US Department of Homeland Security has identified 18 critical infrastructures and key resource sectors that are, in the words of the DHS, “the backbones of the nation’s security, public health, safety, economic vitality and way of life.” These infrastructures include systems that enable and deliver energy, water, communications and IT, just to name a few. The DHS says that if any of these systems were to be incapacitated it would have a debilitating effect on the country, potentially leading to catastrophic numbers of casualties and property loss. It’s no wonder President Obama’s administration is paying so much attention to cyber security, after all, all of these systems are vulnerable via Internet-connected networks used to manage their operations.
To protect critical infrastructure systems, enterprise owner-operators need strong access management in place to secure information on a need-to-know basis.
The subject of access management places us squarely into the middle of an application security debate. Not the debate over how to develop secure code or how to best issue patches and other fixes, but rather how to best shield data from unauthorized access to the many applications served out over the Internet. Within this debate, there is one issue that I think all sides could agree upon, which is that the nation can’t afford to protect its systems used to operate critical infrastructures through a one application at a time approach. There simply are too many applications in use that need securing and a one at a time approach would take years, countless resources and put time on the hackers’ side.
At Rohati, we’ve brought to market a revolutionary technology that changes the dynamic of access management from one at a time to “many at one time.” This many at one time approach reduces risk by removing the luxury of time from hackers’ resource kits and by accelerating the speed that access management can be applied across the breadth of applications deployed on corporate networks. Additionally, the speed at which Rohati secures access reduces costs associated with traditional security approaches.
Consider the case of the US Energy Infrastructure’s electric power grid, a critical infrastructure that is a maze of high voltage power lines transporting power to all facets of the nation’s public and private sectors. We know from published reports in publications like Network World and the Wall Street Journal that recently hackers have attacked the grid, potentially in an attempt to secure information and gather intelligence on how to shut it down. Can the US afford to secure access to systems used to manage the grid one application at a time? Wouldn’t the more logical course of action be one that can lay down protection at one fell swoop?
Now is the time to adopt a change in conventional access management thinking, now is the time to invest in solutions that can address these issues much more effectively and much faster. Time is one luxury we do not have.
/shane
Earlier, I kicked off my cloud discussion with a look at some of the different cloud definitions in circulation. Since then, a number of additional descriptions have risen to the surface, but it’s safe to say that they’re all very similar. On this same topic, McKinsey released a report, “Clearing the Air on Cloud Computing,” that sparked a tirade in many of the
As early as April 2008,
Tech stimulus? I think it is safe to say that last week the IT industry breathed a cautious sigh of relief when the